tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213028812225302251.post5302378712969965187..comments2007-07-17T15:43:26.554-07:00Liquid Airhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16827347144715617481noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213028812225302251.post-4017324900405332782007-07-17T15:43:00.000-07:002007-07-17T15:43:00.000-07:00Wow. Thats very clever. I've got a couple thoughts that might help that I'll post with your photo.Liquid Airhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16827347144715617481noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213028812225302251.post-68118009945008170032007-07-11T22:34:00.000-07:002007-07-11T22:34:00.000-07:00Just yesterday I was thinking about the problem of achieving something similar, but with the interesting twist that I was restricted to using just one flash instead of two.<BR/><BR/>I didn't manage to get as polished an outcome as you did, but as a proof-of-concept, I'm pretty pleased how <A HREF="http://www.flickr.com/photos/randomprocesses/774137265/" REL="nofollow">this </A>turned out. What do you think?Aaronhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09482639674991201293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213028812225302251.post-91134088452592434652007-07-05T22:50:00.000-07:002007-07-05T22:50:00.000-07:00Thanks...I appreciate the explanation.Robhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08884754482395733544noreply@blogger.com